🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. In-network. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Out-of-pocket expenses. Co-payment. Co-insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. Affordable Care Act. Health Maintenance Organization. Preferred Provider Organization. EPO. POS. HDHP. Health Savings Account. FSA. HRA. EOB. COBRA. SHOP. Individual coverage. Family coverage. Premium tax credits.

Confused? You should be. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average entrepreneur. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the right medical coverage for our business – or for our families – appears to require it requires a PhD in healthcare.

The Healthcare System Isn't Just Complicated, It Is Expensive

Based on a recent study, the average family spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Currently federal operations is shut down because political disagreements over tax credits which analysts predict will lead to a doubling of premiums for numerous US citizens.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider universal healthcare coverage here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm proposing for our current Medicare system – an insurance system – merely extend to cover everyone. Our infrastructure doesn't change. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Trust me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would require contributions from both employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker making moderate income pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays about 13.75%.

Does this appear like a lot? Not if you contrast that with what average American pays. I can name dozens of businesses who are routinely paying between 8% to 15% of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that in comprehensive systems, those payments also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and unemployment benefits in addition to supporting healthcare facilities. When including these expenses versus our current spending on retirement programs, job loss coverage and vacation benefits, the gap narrows.

Implementation in the US

For America, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a system already established. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than lower-income earners. There would be both an employee and company payments. And, like much of federal military, IT, social programs and transportation services, the system could be managed to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Advantages for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put us on a level playing field with our larger competitors who can afford superior coverage. It would make management much easier (automatic payroll withholding remitted like social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to benefit firms and insurance providers).

It would make it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, instead of going through the complicated (and fruitless) theater of bargaining with the big insurance providers required annually each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist improved comprehension about benefits among workers – as opposed to the current system which require them to decipher the complications of current options. And there would certainly be reduced responsibility for companies since we wouldn't would be privy to workers' medical records for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Capitalist Perspective

I'm as capitalist as they get. But I've learned that government has a significant role in our lives, including national security to funding essential systems. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare strengthens our economy's infrastructure. It's a better, simpler approach for small businesses that employ the majority of the country's workers and fund half the economic output. It enables for workers to enjoy better health, come to work more often and increase productivity.

Addressing Concerns

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Certainly. Given all the healthcare cost increases experienced recently, it's clear that the Affordable Care Act isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where big changes are easier to implement. But expanding universal Medicare, even with increased taxation that would be incurred, would still be a better and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Honest Assessment

As Americans, must reduce national pride. Our healthcare system isn't so great. We rank significantly behind numerous nations with the best healthcare in the world, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect amid present circumstances could be that we undertake serious examination at ourselves and agree that major reforms need to happen.