🔗 Share this article

In today's Britain, public demonstration is no longer a fundamental right. Rather, it has become a conditional permission that those in power allow or withhold at their discretion. This represents the implication of proposed measures that the current government is advancing, which would determine when and where protests can take place, with possible prison sentences for those who defy these limitations.

Gradual Weakening of Civil Liberties

Earlier governments had already undermined this essential right: the previous Tory administration had granted law enforcement extensive new authorities, which international human rights organizations had censured as "serious and undue restrictions" on democratic freedoms. Collectively, these progressive assaults on freedom have effectively eliminated the hard-won right to freedom of protest.

Exploiting Tragedy to Rationalize Suppression

The most recent limitations are being justified by referring to last week's heinous antisemitic attack on a Manchester Islamic center. We can all agree on universal agreement that the security of British Jews must be protected. However, using this horrific incident as a pretext to suppress dissent is not only disconnected to that responsibility but distorts it.

"If you can't set boundaries at genocide, you probably can't draw the line at democracy," observed a well-known American author, whose words that applies equally for the current government.

Historical Context of Demonstration

Consider Britain's rich history of public demonstration and activism against racism and fascism, from the 1936 Battle of Cable Street to postwar Jewish groups opposing fascism and the 1970s demonstrations against the National Front. Many of these early protesters were branded as radicals in their era, even while they were advocating the freedoms of minorities.

Present Situation

In today's complicated landscape, here's what's truly happening: Israel – a foreign state – is committing acts that international bodies have described as systematic destruction. Its military actions have led the International Criminal Court to release arrest warrants against Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defense minister.

International public opinion has changed significantly against Israel's military campaign. In Britain, a large percentage of the public believe Israel has likely committed war crimes. Most people would support a complete ban on weapons exports to the nation, and back the arrest of Netanyahu.

Suppressing Opposition

Having essentially failed the public debate, Israel's supporters are now exploiting a vile anti-Jewish attack to attempt to silence a mass movement against a ethical disaster. The British government seems involved in this attempt. Government officials have failed to implement comprehensive sanctions on Israel and have permitted weapon shipments to continue.

People who are demonstrating against the destruction of Gaza have been labeled as hateful extremists. Yet there's a significant reason why there hasn't been a more extensive crackdown on these demonstrators until now: very limited protesters have made truly offensive statements about Jewish people, giving law enforcement little justification to intervene.

Problematic Association

Equating Jewish identity with the policies of the government of Israel is not only manipulative but also harmful. The official definition of antisemitism, adopted by the British government and numerous institutions, has been appropriately questioned for potentially stifling legitimate criticism of Israel. However, there should be universal agreement about one of its central illustrations: that "holding Jewish people generally accountable for decisions of the state of Israel" constitutes antisemitism.

Increasing Limitations

This is why we've arrived at a point where police authorities can propose that protests opposing Israel's policies should be called off because they might "inadvertently or intentionally" endorse antisemitism. Similarly, government officials have stated that recognition of Palestinian statehood has made organizations "implicated" in alleged abuse experienced by British Jews.

Double Standards

On the very day as the synagogue attack, the Israeli military killed dozens of Palestinians in Gaza – adding to the terrible count from 24 months of ongoing violence that have taken tens of thousands of human lives. British politicians and news organizations have barely concealed the limited value they attach to Palestinian existence. This represents one of the boldest demonstrations of discrimination in contemporary society.

Breaking Boundaries

Our government has already passed a dangerous boundary by banning a specific activist group, a peaceful, human rights-focused direct action organization. Multiple thousands of British demonstrators have been arrested, mostly for carrying signs opposing genocide and endorsing the proscribed group. Many of those detained are elderly citizens; including a retired priest and the daughter of a Holocaust survivor.

International Parallels

It's easy to see where this path leads. In the United States, political leaders helped vilify pro-Palestinian protests: a ex-political leader suggested that some were "connected to" foreign governments, while the current president characterized such demonstrations as anti-Jewish. In doing so, they helped legitimize the repressive measures on such protests – and on free speech in general.

Future Concerns

If a hard-right government comes to power, it would be granted sweeping powers to suppress dissent. What might a new administration do with this repressive toolkit? Our ancestors struggled, suffered and died to establish our freedoms. We may ultimately rue how easily we allowed them to be eroded.